General discussion about Fantasy Football
by Mikesherman » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:04 am
I got offered I send griffin 3 and get Vick in return. Thoughts? Who has more trade value? I'm personally not too crazy about griffin this year, but like Brent said in a different topic a big preseason could get big value.
-
Mikesherman
- Veteran

-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:33 pm
by FST_Brent » Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:43 pm
Done deal - you are getting crazy high hype value for RG3
I think Vick (who went number one overall in some draft last year) has a nice bounce back year and is pretty much a lock to out perform the rookie.
The weapons around Vick are so much better as well
Done deal
Follow us on TWITTER @fantasyadvice (great handle right?)
-

FST_Brent
- Fantasy Expert

-
- Posts: 5796
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:38 am
by Mikesherman » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:16 pm
Thanks Brent, you and the rest pf FST has really helped me out In both football and baseball. Right now I have stafford as my starting QB, should I trade him to open up room for Vick? I'm. Not really sure what to do with Vick at the moment. He's so productive when he plays but he always gets hurt. Same with stafford, but I'm confident his shoulder issues are a thing of the past. Any suggestions on what to do?
-
Mikesherman
- Veteran

-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:33 pm
by Mikesherman » Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:38 am
Vetoed

-
Mikesherman
- Veteran

-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:33 pm
by FST_TheBrain » Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:43 pm
You shouldn't roll into the season with Stafford and Vick at QB for three reasons. (1) You would have too much value sitting on your bench week-to-week; (2) They are both prone to injuries; and, (3) There is a ton of value in the QB's ranked a little lower.
Personally, I would deal Vick and try to get back a starting WR or RB and a QB in the 10th or 11th range... Freeman, Cutler, Schaub, etc.
-

FST_TheBrain
- Fantasy Expert

-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:52 am
-
by FST_Brent » Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:45 pm
That is terrible that it got vetoed - if someone accepted it who are they to veto the trade?
I HATE league vote trade leagues
(it was pretty much lopside in your favor but think last year ppl would have vetoed Cam Newton for Rivers in a second --- and they would have been wrong)
Follow us on TWITTER @fantasyadvice (great handle right?)
-

FST_Brent
- Fantasy Expert

-
- Posts: 5796
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:38 am
by Mikesherman » Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:20 pm
I know Brent, it's a pay league on espn. Someone protests and they literally ALWAYS veto. I've seen the most fair trades get vetoed. This is my first year in pay leagues(baseball first, now football). I hate the veto system more than ever.
-
Mikesherman
- Veteran

-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:33 pm
by FST_Legolas » Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:34 am
Sucks about the veto but having RG3 as a backup isn't bad. If he's getting that high of looks in your league, I wouldn't mind you trying to shop him around for a higher upside RB or WR. Stafford is your man at QB so you just need a fill-in for his bye week.
-

FST_Legolas
- Fantasy Expert

-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:56 pm
Return to Fantasy Football Forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Powered by
phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group